In a column published this Tuesday, June 29th The New York Times, The most important magazine United States, The conflict that erupted in Peru after the second round is a “symbolic” example of “what is happening or may happen in a group of countries” in Latin America.
In clear reference to the tactic of Keiko Fujimori, Latin America: Democratic Weakness refers to “condemnation of invisible fraud, disqualification or assault on election courts from power, undermining the already weak institutional structure of our countries”. .
Author, Alberto Pereira Dysca, The candidate quotes the words he uttered during his last election – “We want to know the truth” – by denouncing “fuel without hope” as, without evidence, a fraud in the election.
“Start with these big causes and act as if the country is facing a definite split in history, This is a fundamental part of the conflict. ” In Latin America, with increasing frequency, political alternatives are being put forward and not seen as a normal form of democratic life, but as a catastrophic catastrophe. ”
According to Barrera Dysco, this is not “free” because “Hugo Chavez (Former Venezuelan president) turned his reputation into modern tyranny, showing that democracy can come to power – from there – destroy democracy. ” Daniel Ortega, Ruler of Nicaragua, “imposed himself as a dictator in his country by blood and fire.”
“With the difficulties of each case, political change is somehow maintained in countries like Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico and even Bolivia. See here This shows that the dictatorial test in El Salvador is not an ideological issue, ”says the Venezuelan story and columnist.
“Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, of course, continue to have isolated and minority cases on the continent. Their experiences have created a special alert in other communities in the region,” he continues.
In one region, “the great problems of inequality, poverty and punishment continue unresolved.” Such texts Fujimori, It aims to connect the “idea Political change Disasters and hysteria“It does not seem to be a healthy thing to do.”
Fursa is a popular candidate The second round has been plagued by abuse, despite its complaints being dismissed Electoral systems The absence of arguments and the different election monitoring bodies have confirmed the correctness of the June 6 election.
The Peruvian government has already announced that it is waiting for its final result National Election Referee (JNE) As a result of the second presidential round, before responding to a request for an international audit Fujimori.
In the middle of that panorama, “Rather than demonizing political change and electoral processes, it is necessary to strengthen the institutional structure In Latin America. This is the only way differences can be resolved by votes, not by bullets, ”the NYT text concludes.
Currently, the JNE is discussing the appeals put forward by the party Fujimori Against the ballot papers questioned by the right-wing candidate, but they have so far been rejected.
Once the election committee has concluded with discussions, it can announce the winner of the election, which will determine the final choice of candidate for the Peruvian Libre, Point Pedro Castillo.
With information from EFE.